← Back to benchmark results

COMPUTATIONAL CANDIDATE / PARETO

BF-RPT-0002-04071

Validation priority / RECOMMENDEDPreference score / 79.868PARETO / 1

This is a computational candidate and has not yet been experimentally validated.

COMPOSITION / EXACT

Composition

PLA85.0 wt%85.0%
PHBV0.0 wt%0.0%
MCC15.0 wt%15.0%
ATBC0.0 wt%0.0%
COMPATIBILIZER0.0 wt%0.0%

Σ = 100.0 wt%

SELECTION / TRADE-OFF

Why it was selected

This candidate lies on the non-dominated set and adds a distinct trade-off profile to the recommended group. Its score reflects the published project preferences, not a universal scientific ranking.

Computational robustness
100.0%
Reference dataset
CNX-RPT-REF-2026.08

RESULT / CLASSIFIED

Evidence and result classes

ComponentValueEvidence classSources
Bio-based content100.00 %Exact calculationSRC-MCC-BIO ↗SRC-PLA-PDS ↗
Elastic modulus — conservative lower estimate3,792.32 MPaEngineering estimateSRC-MCC-MODULUS ↗SRC-PLA-PDS ↗
Elastic modulus — conservative upper estimate4,209.16 MPaEngineering estimateSRC-MCC-MODULUS ↗SRC-PLA-PDS ↗
Estimated raw-material cost2.353 EUR/kgExact calculationPRICE-SCENARIO ↗
Estimated density1,277.32 kg/m³Engineering estimateSRC-MCC-MODULUS ↗SRC-PLA-PDS ↗

PROCESS / PRELIMINARY

Preliminary processing compatibility

INSUFFICIENT DATA

Documented interval overlap: 180–210 °C

Not available: MCC

LIMIT / HONEST

Not currently modelled

Tensile strength, elongation at break, impact response, permeability, heat-deflection temperature, industrial thermoformability, compostability, biodegradation time, food-contact compliance, migration and shelf life.

VALIDATE / REQUIRED

Experimental validation required

This is a computational candidate and has not yet been experimentally validated.

PROVENANCE / CANDIDATE

Reproduce and audit the run

Run ID
d48ba24d-ea2a-4958-8283-3f1605bb3be3
Reproducibility seed
20260829
Input fingerprint
1243e8bd9fd391d5b350…
Calculation completed
2026-08-29 12:43 UTC